Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Securing viable metapopulations of the Marsh Fritillary butterfly, Euphydryas aurinia, (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Northern England

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Marsh Fritillary butterfly, Euphydryas aurinia (Rott.), is regarded as the classic species that requires landscape-scale management in order to maintain viable populations. This paper describes the background to an extinction of this species in Northern England, United Kingdom, and the action taken to reintroduce and monitor the progress of sub-populations between 2007 and 2009. A captive breeding stock was secured using the last 155 known wild caterpillars in 2004 and supplemented by 95 caterpillars collected under licence from the nearest extant populations in western Scotland. Through captive breeding the source population for subsequent reintroduction was increased dramatically and 42,400 caterpillars were used in 2007 to reintroduce the butterfly to four locations in North and West Cumbria. Each of the release sites is within known historical network areas where the butterfly had thrived in past decades. The intention was to restore multiple habitat patches across each network area and eventually establish viable metapopulations across these landscapes. Adults and larval webs have been monitored since 2007 and show that introduction has been successful at three out of the four locations. The failure at the fourth site appears to be unrelated to habitat condition and the causes are currently being investigated. Work is continuing to secure appropriate management of suitable habitat within each landscape area and the number of sub-populations in one area will be increased in the 2010 season.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Respectively M25 and M24 in the British National Vegetation Classification (Rodwell 1991) .

  2. This can readily be detected by the basal plate of the female genitalia showing as a bare plate, devoid of white scales.

References

  • Asher J, Warren M, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Jeffcoate S (2001) The millennium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzholtz PE, Ehrig A, Lindeborg M, Dinnétz P (2007) Food plant density, patch isolation and vegetation height determine occurrence in a Swedish metapopulation of the Marsh Fritillary Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg 1775) (Lepidoptera. Nymphalidae). J Insect Conserv 11:343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulman CR, Wilson RJ, Holt AR, Bravo LG, Early RI, Warren MS, Thomas CD (2007) Minimum viable metapopulation size, extinction debt, and the conservation of a declining species. Ecol Appl 17:1460–1473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1992) The conservation of natural habitats and wild fauna and flora (Council Directive 92/43/EEC). CEC, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (1984) The structure and dynamics of butterfly populations. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR (eds) The biology of butterflies. Academic Press, London, pp 25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford HD, Ford EB (1930) Fluctuations in numbers and its influence on variation in Melitaea aurinia Rott. (Lepidoptera). Trans R Ent Soc Lond 78:345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox R, Asher J, Brereton T, Roy D, Warren M (2006) The state of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Nature Bureau, Newbury, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1977) Why have some animals evolved to regulate a high body temperature? Am Nat 111:623–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce DA (2001) The use of molecular genetics in the formulation of conservation strategies for Lepidoptera. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Birmingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker M, Schmitt T (2010) Demography, dispersal and movement pattern of Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) at the Iberian Peninsula: an alarming example in an increasingly fragmented landscape ? J Insect Conserv 14:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei GCN, Camara MKD (1999) Behaviour of a specialist parasitoid, Cotesia melitaearum: from individual behaviour to metapopulation processes. Ecol Entomol 24:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei G, Hanski I (1997) Metapopulation structure of Cotesia melitaearum, a specialist parasitoid of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Oikos 78:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei G, Hanski I (1998) Spatial dynamics of two competing parasitoids in a host metapopulation. J Anim Ecol 67:422–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter K (1981) The population dynamics of small colonies of the butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. D.Phil. Thesis. Oxford University, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter K (1982) Basking behaviour in larvae of the butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. Oikos 38:308–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter K (1983) Multivoltinism in Apanteles bignellii and the influence of weather on synchronisation with its host Euphydryas aurinia. Ent Exp Appl 34:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell J (1991) British plant communities, vol 2. Mires and Heaths, Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Schtickzelle N, Choutt J, Goffart P, Fichefet V, Baguette M (2005) Metapopulation dynamics and conservation of the Marsh Fritillary butterfly: population viability analysis and management options for a critically endangered species in Western Europe. Biol Conserv 126:569–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Biodiversity Group (1999) Tranche 2 action plans. Volume IV–Invertebrates. English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Sway CAM, Warren MS (1999) Red data book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and environment series No. 99, Council of Europe, Strasbourg

  • Wahlberg N, Klemetti T, Hanski I (2002a) Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the Marsh Fritillary butterfly. Ecography 25:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg N, Klemetti T, Selonen V, Hanski I (2002b) Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies. Oecologia 130:33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS (1994) The UK status and suspected metapopulation structure of a threatened European butterfly, the Marsh Fritillary, Eurodryas aurinia. Biol Conserv 67:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS, Thomas CD, Thomas JA (1984) The status of the heath fritillary butterfly Mellicta athalia Rott. Biol Conserv 29:287–305 (In Britain)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank: the enthusiastic volunteers of the Cumbria Branch of Butterfly Conservation for their dedication and hard work in rearing livestock and monitoring the adults and larval webs; the staff in Natural England and farmers who we have worked with to restore and manage habitat for the Marsh Fritillary; staff of the National Trust, National Park and Environment Agency who have provided support and funding to secure sites; and finally to the horticultural skills of Messrs R and J Bennett who have supplied rearers and farmers with many thousands of S. pratensis plants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith Porter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Porter, K., Ellis, S. Securing viable metapopulations of the Marsh Fritillary butterfly, Euphydryas aurinia, (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Northern England. J Insect Conserv 15, 111–119 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9328-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9328-9

Keywords

Navigation